Author: Brian Hoffman 2014-09-15 14:49:14
Published on: 2014-09-15T14:49:14+00:00
The debate between Brian Hoffman and Jeff Garzik pertains to the value of in-person identity verification within the context of Bitcoin. While Hoffman argues that vetting an individual's identity is important and undeniable, Garzik contends that online behavioral characteristics are more important. He notes that Satoshi's real-world identity is irrelevant to Bitcoin's function, as the currency's development relies on code and electronic messages. Garzik also dismisses PGP WoT (Web of Trust) as useless geek wanking, suggesting that a person's online behavioral signature is what is relevant. While Hoffman agrees that in-person vetting can be frustrating, he believes that it is still necessary in certain contexts, such as government clearance or credential issuance. However, he does acknowledge that governmental IDs can be forged or different from the online presence of an individual.
Updated on: 2023-06-09T02:34:06.394457+00:00