Author: Lloyd Fournier 2023-09-21 01:44:47+00:00
Published on: 2023-09-21T01:44:47+00:00
AJ,LL is seeking clarification on the distinction between a MuSig2 adaptor signature and a single-singer adaptor with MuSig2. It seems LL wants to understand the key differences between these two concepts. To provide some context, MuSig2 is a cryptographic protocol that allows multiple signers to create a single aggregated signature for a transaction. This helps improve privacy and efficiency in multi-signature schemes. An adaptor signature, on the other hand, is a type of signature that can be "adapted" or tweaked later without invalidating the original signature.Now, let's delve into the specific question raised by LL. A MuSig2 adaptor signature refers to a signature produced using the MuSig2 protocol, where the signer has the ability to adapt or modify the signature after it has been created. This means that even though the signature is initially valid, it can be altered later to produce a different signature that is also valid. The purpose behind this concept is to enhance flexibility in certain scenarios where signature adaptation is required.On the other hand, a single-singer adaptor with MuSig2 refers to a situation where only one signer is involved, but the MuSig2 protocol is still used. In this case, the signature is not intended to be adapted or modified after it has been created. The focus is on utilizing the MuSig2 protocol for achieving secure and efficient single-signer operations.It's worth noting that both concepts leverage the power of the MuSig2 protocol, which brings benefits such as improved security, privacy, and scalability to multi-signature schemes. However, the distinction lies in the ability to adapt the signature in the case of a MuSig2 adaptor signature, whereas a single-singer adaptor with MuSig2 does not involve such adaptation.I hope this clarifies the distinction between a MuSig2 adaptor signature and a single-singer adaptor with MuSig2.
Updated on: 2023-09-22T01:54:40.122659+00:00