Author: Anthony Towns 2022-05-23 21:34:16
Published on: 2022-05-23T21:34:16+00:00
The email thread discusses the feasibility of making ancestor/descendant limits configurable in package relay. It is debated whether these constraints should be specified in a standard protocol or if Core's default mempool policy should be adhered to. The thread also considers the possibility of using batch transactions more generally, and highlights that getpckgtxns is a general way to request a batch of transactions. The sender does not necessarily know if the recipient will be interested in the package based on their feefilter. In addition, a counterexample is given to show why using an ancestor feerate would not be better for sending PCKG INV when a transaction's feerate is above the fee filter. Finally, the sender should send package announcements only when they know the recipient will be interested in the package, based on their feefilter.
Updated on: 2023-05-22T20:03:25.835889+00:00