More thoughts on NOINPUT safety



Summary:

In this communication, ZmnSCPxj responds to aj's original post mentioning the possible conflict between output tagging and Taproot. ZmnSCPxj admits that there may have been a misunderstanding and asks if it is possible to hide the clause "or a NOINPUT sig from A with a non-NOINPUT sig from B" behind a Taproot. They also provide minor reactions to aj's earlier points on using scriptless scripts for HTLCs and bilateral/cooperative close when HTLC is in-flight. Finally, ZmnSCPxj acknowledges that a non-cheating unilateral close does not require NOINPUT.


Updated on: 2023-06-13T17:42:29.564145+00:00