Published on: 2012-03-14T15:20:43+00:00
On March 14, 2012, Amir Taaki sent an email to the Bitcoin-development mailing list addressing Bitcoin Improvement Proposals (BIPs). It was noted that luke-jr withdrew BIP 16 and advocated for BIP 17, which gained consensus to move forward. However, luke-jr then submitted BIP 18, which raised concerns about its technical viability and questioned its purpose given the adoption of BIP 17.Amir Taaki explained the general process of evaluating and accepting BIPs within the community. He emphasized that a draft BIP should be presented to bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net, where it undergoes discussion and evaluation based on specific minimum criteria. However, he pointed out that some BIPs, including BIP 18, had not followed this process before being accepted.The discussion primarily revolved around whether BIP 18 should be accepted into the repository, highlighting the importance of adhering to the proper protocol for evaluating and accepting BIPs. Amir Taaki outlined the criteria for accepting a BIP, including having a clear and comprehensive description of the proposed enhancement, demonstrating a net improvement, and presenting a well-structured implementation that does not overly complicate the protocol.In conclusion, the email exchange focused on the technical soundness and purposefulness of BIP 18, along with the significance of following the established procedure for evaluating and accepting BIPs within the Bitcoin community.
Updated on: 2023-08-01T03:23:24.641485+00:00