Author: Andreas Schildbach 2012-01-31 08:23:40
Published on: 2012-01-31T08:23:40+00:00
The author of this post expresses his preference for BIP 21 over BIP 20 and is neutral on the 'send' parameter present in both BIPs. He believes that a practical use case should be given in the BIP. Additionally, he finds the 'version' parameter unclear and questions why it is an ";" parameter rather than a normal "&" parameter. Amir Taaki posted a modification of BIP 20, sans the alternative non-decimal number stuff, which the author discusses. The author plans to ask GUI client implementations such as MultiBit or Bitcoin-Qt if they support BIP 20 or BIP 21. More weight will be given to GUIs with actual URI scheme implementations, and it's good to have a general consensus. The email ends with an advertisement for a comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers and information about the Bitcoin-development mailing list.
Updated on: 2023-06-05T02:05:08.663161+00:00