Author: Luke Dashjr 2016-02-02 02:30:55
Published on: 2016-02-02T02:30:55+00:00
The discussion is about whether the "default_witness_commitment" should be included in the standard protocol or not. The argument against including it is that it could encourage centralization of mining pools and make server-side implementation more vulnerable to DoS attacks. However, there is also an argument for including it to simplify initial adoption and have a known-correct value to use. Additionally, libblkmaker can handle the heavy lifting for mining software. Overall, it seems that the decision to include or exclude "default_witness_commitment" may depend on the specific implementation and goals.
Updated on: 2023-06-11T03:28:00.682608+00:00