secure assigned bitcoin address directory [combined summary]



Individual post summaries: Click here to read the original discussion on the bitcoin-dev mailing list

Published on: 2014-04-02T12:01:51+00:00


Summary:

On the Bitcointalk forum, a discussion has emerged regarding the accessibility and verification of vanity addresses. Some users expressed an interest in making their vanity addresses easily accessible to others while also ensuring ownership verification. However, the current method of signing addresses and posting them on forums is deemed insecure.To address this concern, the possibility of utilizing PGP keyservers was raised. However, it was noted that this approach would only be suitable for single vanity addresses, limiting its effectiveness for multiple addresses.As a potential solution, the concept of webfinger was proposed. Webfinger would allow servers of businesses to confirm and validate ownership of specific addresses. This method holds promise for ensuring secure access and verification of vanity addresses.It remains uncertain if there are any existing plans or initiatives that specifically cater to this use case. The mention of BIP70, which involves Certificate Authorities, was made in relation to addressing this issue. However, it is unclear whether this solution fully resolves the problem at hand.Overall, the email thread showcased ongoing conversations and ideas among developers in the Bitcoin space, exploring various approaches to enhance security and improve the efficiency of Bitcoin transactions.For further information and insights on this topic, readers are encouraged to explore the provided links to the relevant discussions on the Bitcointalk forum.


Updated on: 2023-08-01T08:30:54.658130+00:00